CreateNYC: A Look at How NYC’s Cultural Roadmap Makes a Case for the Social Value of the Arts

By Kristin Sakoda Deputy Commissioner & General Counsel, NYC Department of Cultural Affairs and Edwin Torres, Deputy Commissioner, NYC Department of Cultural Affairs*

Photo: Hester Street Collaborative

In July, the City of New York released CreateNYC: A Cultural Plan for All New Yorkers, a first-of-its-kind comprehensive plan to establish New York City’s cultural roadmap for the next decade.  The plan sets forth objectives and strategies for achieving a more inclusive, equitable, and resilient cultural ecosystem. It examines a number of issue areas including diversity, equity and inclusion, education, affordability, and health of the cultural sector that are essential to a vibrant, creative city. Following recommendations in each of the issue areas, CreateNYC also lays out a number of immediate actions including a targeted increase in City support for arts and culture in low-income communities.

Led by the NYC Department of Cultural Affairs, the CreateNYC cultural planning process began with an intensive research, discovery, and data collection phase that laid a foundation for the work to come. We harnessed the voices of nearly 200,000 New Yorkers in a robust community engagement process to inform CreateNYC.  In addition to hundreds of public meetings and months of digital engagement, these efforts included a Siena College Research Institute public opinion phone poll of NYC residents, which revealed that an eye-popping 97% of respondents agree that arts and culture are important to quality of life.  The poll also uncovered barriers to cultural participation such as transportation and cost.

CreateNYC also leveraged results of ground-breaking research by University of Pennsylvania’s Social Impact of the Arts Project (SIAP) – “Culture and Social Wellbeing in New York City.” The researchers spent two years working with the City’s municipal agencies and cultural community to analyze data on the presence of cultural resources in low-income communities – nonprofit organizations, for-profit businesses (such as live music clubs and recording studios), artists, and cultural participants (residents who engage with cultural events) – and how these correlate with social well-being.

SIAP identified three major findings about the relationship between culture and social well-being.  First, the presence of cultural resources in a neighborhood track closely with the median household income of that neighborhood. In other words, lower-income neighborhoods tend to have lower levels of cultural resources, while wealthier neighborhoods have many times more.

Second, SIAP found that the presence of cultural resources is highly correlated with positive social impacts in three realms: health, safety, and education. When controlled for race, ethnicity, and economic status, the presence of a high concentration of cultural resources in low-income neighborhoods is significantly correlated with a decrease in residents suffering from diabetes, hypertension, or obesity; a decrease in cases of child abuse and neglect; a decrease in teen pregnancies; a decrease in the felony crime rate; and an increase in students scoring in the top stratum on English and math exams.

Finally, SIAP found that the correlation between the presence of cultural resources and positive social indicators in health, safety and education as described above is greater in low-income neighborhoods than in high-income neighborhoods.  So while the presence of cultural resources is correlated with positive social indicators in all neighborhoods, once researchers control for household income, the correlation is far more statistically significant in low-income neighborhoods.  These results suggest that investment in art and culture makes a more meaningful impact on the lives of people in low-income communities.

When we shared the SIAP findings with our fellow City agencies – particularly those that work in health, education, and safety – we were pleased to discover colleagues were highly engaged, and the study findings were met with overwhelmingly positive response.  Agencies such as the New York Department for the Aging, the Department of Probation, and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene were keen to hear that cultural resources are correlated with improved health, safety, and education.  After all, these findings point us toward an opportunity in the prevention of poor health, the mitigation of high crime, and improvement of educational outcomes.  Investments in cultural resources not only provide an innovative path to social change, but also have the benefit of being low-stigma and relatively attractive to participants – all things that our local government values in its services to constituents.

To be clear, SIAP does not assert that cultural resources cause positive social outcomes.  Rather, cultural resources are elements of a healthy, thriving community.  This allows the City to integrate investments in culture into a larger cross-sector strategy of investments in our communities.

Since releasing CreateNYC in July, we’ve launched a number of new programs and initiatives that build on the recommendations in the plan.  For example:

  • The agency’s Cultural Development Fund provides program funding to over 900 nonprofit organizations across the city each year. This year, as part of CreateNYC, additional funding was directed to organizations based in and working within areas of the city that were identified by SIAP as places for increased investment.
  • Affordability was the single biggest concern expressed during CreateNYC’s public engagement period. Thanks to the NYC City Council, the city’s five borough arts councils are receiving additional funding dedicated to supporting individual artists and their work.
  • With support from the Mayor’s Office, we’ve launched a “Culture Cabinet” to help leverage City resources dedicated to arts and culture initiatives across City agencies and promote collaborations aimed at increasing access to culture for all New Yorkers.

We’ve also been delighted to partner with philanthropic colleagues in the private sector and look forward to more collaborative efforts ahead.

Arts and culture provide immeasurable value to us as individuals, as communities, and as a society as a whole.  The findings of the SIAP study and the CreateNYC cultural plan lay the foundation for increased equitable investment in arts and culture, not only for arts funders, but for all who seek positive change.

*Kristin Sakoda is Deputy Commissioner & General Counsel of the NYC Department of Cultural Affairs; Edwin Torres, formerly Deputy Commissioner of NYC Department of Cultural Affairs, is now President and CEO of Grantmakers in the Arts

Join CECP

CECP partnership is by invitation only and limited to multibillion-dollar for-profit companies. While CECP does not offer formal partnership (renewed on a yearly basis) for small to mid-size companies, or non-corporate institutions (e.g., academic, nonprofit, government), our latest research, event summaries, and benchmarking reports are all available, free of charge, on our website.

Sign up for the E-Community